Analysis of IFMBE-CED 2017 Worldwide Clinical Engineering Survey

Main Article Content

Leonardo Nascimento https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-8074
Saide Calil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0290-1227
Tom Judd https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8771-8626
Yadin David https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8634-2452

Keywords

Clinical Engineering, Body of Knowledge, Body of Practice, Clinical Engineering Survey

Abstract

Background and Objective: Clinical Engineering professionals are fundamental to the deployment of healthcare technology and to the management of its life cycle. As the role of technology grows in healthcare, so does the need for trained clinical engineering practitioners and the dynamic nature of the domain requires them to maintain their skills. However, the skills and activities required from clinical engineers around the world are not homogeneous, so the Clinical Engineering Division at IFMBE promoted a global survey to identify a common body of knowledge and body of practices for the profession.


Material and Methods: This survey, based on a previous one conducted by the ACCE, was aimed at collecting data about CE practices and the importance of certain competencies for their practitioners.


Results: Survey results indicate the profession still maintains certain traditional characteristics, such as the predominance of professionals with a background in electrical, electronic, or mechanical engineering and the prevalence of hospitals and clinics as employers. Some patterns in the perceived relevance of certain kinds of knowledge among different regions were also identified.


Conclusion: Overall, the survey seems adequate to reveal which skills and activities clinical engineers considered the most relevant, but more responses are required before a solid Body of Knowledge and Body of Practice can be defined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract 1688 | PDF Downloads 665

References

1. US Department of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2017. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2017/may/oes172031.htm
2. Judd, T., & David, Y. (2018). Making a Difference – Global Health Technology Success Stories: Overview of over 400 submissions from 125 Countries. Global Clinical Engineering Journal, 1(1), 24-49. https://doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v1i1.4
3. Frize M. Results of an international survey of clinical engineering departments – Part 2. Med Biol Eng Computing 1990;28:160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441772
4. Nagel J. BIOMEDEA. In: Jarm T, Kramar P, Zupanic A. (eds) 11th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biomedical Engineering and Computing 2007. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 16. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2007. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-73044-6_289
5. Nagel J. BIOMEDEA Invitation. Stuttgart: Institut für Biomedizinische Technik; 2005. Available at: http://www.vvb-bmt.nl/EmailAlerts/attach/20050722-01.pdf
6. Wear J. Certification/Registration of Clinical Engineering Practitioners. CED/IFMBE 2017. Available at: http://cedglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CED-Certification-White-Paper-with-Annexes.pdf
7. Calil S. J., Nascimento L. N., Painter F. R. (2007) Findings of the Worldwide Clinical Engineering Survey conducted by the Clinical Engineering Division of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. IFMBE Proc. vol. 16. 11th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biomedical Engineering and Computing 2007, pp 1085–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73044-6_280
8. Calil. S. J., Oliveira R. R. V., Nascimento L. N. (2009) "Findings of the Latin America Clinical Engineering Survey Conducted by the Clinical Engineering Division of International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering." World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. September 7-12. 2009. Munich. Germany. Springer. Berlin. Heidelberg.
9. Suhan A. 2015 American College of Clinical Engineering Body of Knowledge Survey Results. J Clin Engineer 2017;42(3)