The Status of Medical Devices and their Utilization in 9 Tertiary Hospitals and 5 Research institutions in Uganda
Main Article Content
Keywords
Medical Devices, Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare Technology, Clinical Engineering, Appropriate Healthcare Technologies, Health Technology Management
Abstract
Backgrounds and Objective: Advancements in technology have led to great strides in research and innovation that have improved healthcare provision around the world. However, the majority of the technology available is underutilized in Sub-Saharan Africa. In addition, the ever-increasing sophistication and cost of medical equipment means that access and proper use is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is, however, a general paucity of well-documented evidence for the utilization of medical equipment in LMICs. Therefore, this study evaluates the current availability and utilization of medical equipment in tertiary hospitals and research facilities in Uganda and provides baseline information to clinical/biomedical engineers, innovators, managers, and policymakers.
Material and Methods: The study evaluated the equipment currently used in 9 purposively selected public tertiary hospitals and 5 research laboratories representing different regions of Uganda. Data were collected by personnel specialized in biomedical engineering utilizing a mixed-method approach that involved inventory taking and surveys directed to the health workers in the designated health facilities.
Results: The hospitals contributed 1995 (85%) pieces of medical equipment while the research laboratories contributed 343 (15%) pieces amounting to 2338 pieces of equipment involved in the study. On average, 34% of the medical equipment in the health facilities was faulty, and 85.6% lacked manuals.
Discussion and conclusion: Although innovative solutions and donated equipment address the immediate and long-term goals of resource-constrained settings, our study demonstrated several issues around existing medical devices, and these need immediate attention.
Downloads
Abstract 2183 | PDF Downloads 1141
References
2.Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Getz G. Advances in under-standing cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics 2010;11:685–96.
3.Morozova O, Marra MA. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Ge-nomics 2008;92(5):252–64.
4.Kwan C and Ernst JD. HIV and tuberculosis: A deadly human syndemic. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2011;24.
5.Samb, B. et al. Prevention and management of chronic disease: A litmus test for health-systems strengthen-ing in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet 2010:376.
6.Beaglehole, R. et al. Improving the prevention and management of chronic disease in low-income and middle-income countries: a priority for primary health care. The Lancet 2008;372.
7.Atun, R. et al. Improving responsiveness of health systems to non-communicable diseases. The Lancet 2014;381.
8.Otero HJ, Ondategui-Parra S, Nathanson EM, et al. Utilization management in radiology: basic concepts and applications. J Am Coll Radiol 2006;3.
9.Donabedian. A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Quarterly 2005;83.
10.Ademe BW, Tebeje B, Molla A. Availability and utilization of medical devices in Jimma zone hospitals, Southwest Ethiopia: A case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16.
11.Kim JY, Farmer P, Porter ME. Redefining global health-care delivery. The Lancet 2013;382.
12.Meara JG, et al. Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. The Lancet 2015;386.
13.Elbireer AM, Opio AA, Brough RL, et al. Strengthen-ing public laboratory service in sub-Saharan Africa: Uganda case study. Lab Med 2011;42.
14.Anyangwe SCE and Mtonga C. Inequities in the global health workforce: The greatest impediment to health in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Environment Res Public Health 2007;4.
15.Kiwanuka SN, et al. Access to and utilisation of health services for the poor in Uganda: a systematic review of available evidence. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hy-giene 2008;102.
16.Bryce CL and Clin KE. The supply and use of selected medical technologies. Health Aff 1998;17.
17.Howie SRC, et al. Beyond good intentions: Lessons on equipment donation from an African hospital. Bull. World Health Organ 2008;86.
18.Odedra M, Bennett M, Goodman S, and Lawrie M. Sub-Saharan Africa: A technological desert. Communicat ACM 1993;36.
19.Dohn MN and Dohn,AL. Quality of care on short-term medical missions: experience with a standardized patient record and related issues. Missiology An Int. Rev 2003;31.
20.World Health Organization. Medical device donations: considerations for solicitation and provision. WHO Med. Device Tech Ser 2011.
21.Emmerling D, Dahinten A, and Malkin RA. Problems with systems of medical equipment provision: an evaluation in Honduras, Rwanda and Cambodia identi-fies opportunities to strengthen healthcare systems. Health Technol (Berl) 2018;8.
22.Malkin RA. Design of health care technologies for the developing world. Ann Rev Biomed Engineer 2007;9.
23.Perry L and Malkin R. Effectiveness of medical equip-ment donations to improve health systems: How much medical equipment is broken in the developing world? Med Biol Engineer Comput 2011;49.
24.Masum H. et al. Venture funding for science-based African health innovation. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2010;10.
25.Adelman HS and Taylor L. On sustainability of proj-ect innovations as systemic change. J Educat Psychol Consult 2003;14.
26.Martelli N and van den Brink H. Special funding schemes for innovative medical devices in French hospitals: The pros and cons of two different approaches. Health Policy (New. York) 2014;117.
27.World Health Organization. Medical Devices : Manag-ing the mismatch: an outcome of the priority medical devices project: methodology briefing paper. World Heal. Organ 2010.
28.Richards-Kortum R and Oden M. Devices for low-resource health care. Science 2013;342.
29.WHO. Compendium of innovative health technologies for low-resource settings: assistive devices, eHealth solutions, medical devices. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data; 2014.
30.World Health Organization. Guidelines for Health Care Equipment Donations; 1997.
31.Ploss B. et al. Part II: U.S.—Sub-Saharan Africa Edu-cational Partnerships for Medical Device Design. Ann Biomed Eng 2017;45.
32. Ministry of Health. Operation Manual for Regional Medical Equipment Maintenance Workshops and Medical Equipment Maintenance Guidelines A; 2013.
33.WHO. Technical Specifications for Oxygen Concentra-tors. WHO Medical Device Technical Series; 2015.
34.Mosadeghrad, A. M. Factors influencing healthcare service quality. Int J Heal Policy Manag 2014;3.
35.Ministry of Health. Health Sector Development Plan 2015/16 - 2019/20. RoU 110; 2015.
36.Malkin R and Keane A. Evidence-based approach to the maintenance of laboratory and medical equipment in resource-poor settings. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010;48.
37.Uthman OA, et al. Increasing the value of health research in the WHO African Region beyond 2015 - Reflecting on the past, celebrating the present and building the future: A bibliometric analysis. BMJ Open 2015;5.
38.Sekyonda Z, et al. Supply chain of routine orthopae-dic implants in Kampala, Uganda: public-private workarounds arising from poverty and scarcity. Glob Heal Innov 2018;1.
39.Auditor General. Management of Procurement and Distribution of Essential Medicines and Health Sup-plies by National Medical Stores. 2016. Available at: http://www.oag.go.ug/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Procurement-Distribution-of-Essential-Medicines-Health-Supplies-by-NMS.pdf. (Accessed: 18th Febru-ary 2021)
40.Ministry of Health. National Medical Equipment Policy. 2009.
41.Auditor General. Report of the on Acquisition and Uti-lization of Medical Equipment Under Uganda Health Systems Strengthening Project (UHSSP). 2015.
42.Houngbo PT, et al. The root causes of ineffective and inefficient healthcare technology management in Be-nin public health sector. Heal Policy Technol 2017;6.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) must obtain all parties consent [co-author(s), others if applicable] and submit the acceptance of Copyright Agreement with their paper. Written permission must be obtained by the author for material that has been published in copyrighted material; this includes tables, figures, and quoted text that exceeds 150 words. A copy of all permissions must accompany the manuscript when published in copyrighted material. The author(s) hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. Author(s) must clearly indicate that approval for publication has been received in cases of institutional ownership.
In all submitted material authors retain all copyrights; however, the GlobalCE Journal reserve the right to reprint all or portions of the article and to post all or part of the article online. GlobalCE Journal reserves the right to edit manuscripts as required to publish in the journal. Authors are responsible for obtaining any and all clearances as appropriate. Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and original work (e.g. first published in the Global Clinical Engineering Journal) is properly cited with the original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on www.Globalce.org well as the copyright and license information must be included. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
