Logistics of Medical Devices for Indigenous Health Care Attending in Remote Sites in the Brazilian Amazon Rain Forest

Main Article Content

Ryan Pinto Ferreira https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1134-3397
Fernando Oliveira Andrade https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4692-1924
Anderson Alberto Ramos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4651-2090
Rodrigo Bernardes https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-4133
Saide Jorge Calil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0290-1227

Keywords

Clinical Engineering, Field Hospital, Medical Devices, Amazon Rain Forest, Expedicionarios da Saude

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are in Brazil 896.917 indigenous and 47% of them dwell in the Amazon rainforest region. In order to avoid expensive displacement for this population, especially for surgeries such as hernias and cataracts, the Expedicionários da Saúde NGO attends this specific population three times a year since 2003 organized as a work party regime. This attending is done through a Field Hospital (FH) and is supported by Clinical Engineering (CE). This article presents the characteristics of logistics as well as operation of medical and hospital devices in remote sites of Amazon region. The object of this paper is to describe the transportation processes, installation, operation and maintenance used to ensure safe use of medical devices in one FH in the Amazon forest and to present solutions to proposed adverse conditions throughout the course of several expeditions.


MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was Initially done a survey of the processes of transportation, installation, operation and maintenance of medical devices collected from 24 expeditions to the Amazon forest in a period of 8 years, since the implementation of CE team. A Task Analysis processes was performed to systematically identifying the process used for plan, prepare, transport and operate the medical devices in those past expeditions. Understanding the complexity and the specificities of each expedition a evolutive planning process based on Software Development Spiral Model was used to describes a continuous activity flow, prone to implement and test improvements in each new expedition. Besides the continuous improvement the model also takes in consideration budget solutions once all the work done by the ONG is voluntary. The efficacy of the method was evaluated from indicators of use of medical equipment, the assessment of reported adverse events and the interviews with the professionals of the EC team, users of the medical devices and opinion of the responsible for the managing of the expedition.


RESULTS: Several improvements were observed speciality in the transporting and installation processes, mainly through the adoption of customized packages and manuals for assembly and disassembly of the parts of the medial equipment. Further enhancements were obtained through customizations and adaptations of the devices to the hostile characteristics of the environment. Both physicians and nurses were satisfied with the performance of the devices, and few procedures for repair and calibrate were required after the equipments were installed.


 CONCLUSION:  The CE team is crucial to the implementation of FHs, being essential in the  management of medical technology and in the planning and operation of this type of health structure. The spiral planning method were shown to be very satisfactory mainly because it takes into account the experiences and needs of the past expeditions and for allowing the continuous improvement of the already used processes. Given the great complexity of the RainForest environment in which the technologies will be used and the unpredictability of the risks and challenges to be faced by the EC team the evolutionary work approach presents itself as an applicable solution to planning of future expeditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract 1157 | PDF Downloads 465

References

1.Instituto Sócio Ambiental. População Indígena no Brasil How many are they? Brasília, DF; ISA 2018. Available at: https://pib.socioambiental.org/en/How_many_are_they%3F
2.BRASIL, Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria Executiva Subsecretaria de Planejamento e Orçamento. Programa Anual de Saúde Programação Anual de Saúde (PAS) In: Objetivo 05, 1th edition. Brasília; 2018:17–20.
3.Ribeiro AA, Fortuna CM, Arantes CIS. Nursing work in an Indigenous support institution. Texto Contexto-Enfermagem 2015;24(1):138–45.
4.DSEI-MG/ES. MODELO ASSISTENCIAL PARA A SAÚDE INDÍGENA. Brazil; 2004. Avaliable at: http://sis. funasa. gov. br/portal/publicacoes/pub42. pdf.
5.Rehder JR, Neto HS, Carvalho F, et al. Prevalência e causas de cegueira e baixa de acuidade visual entre grupos indígenas da amazônia legal. Arquivos Médicos do ABC 2014;25(2).
6.Brazilian Health Expeditions. Results. Campinas, SP Brazil; EDS 2019. Avaliable at: http://eds.org.br/english/.
7.Ferreira R. O engenheiro clínico e os expedicionários da saúde. Sínteses: Revista Eletrônica do SIMTEC 2016;4(4):323–23.
8.WHO-PAHO Guidelines for the Use of Foreign Field Hospitals in the Aftermath of Sudden-Impact Disasters. San Salvador: Author; 2003.
9.Rossodivita A. The role of field hospitals in severe environments—guidelines to prepare and build a field hospital during a disaster. Prehospital Disaster Med 2011;26(S1):s95–s96.
10.Finestone AS. Diagnostic medical auxiliary equipment in a field hospital: experience from the Israeli delega-tion to the site of the Turkish earthquake at Adapazari. Militar Med 2001;166(7):637.
11.Bauld TJ. The definition of a clinical engineer. J Clin Engineer 1991;16(5):403–6.
12.Sales CRG, Sabongi ML, dos Reis VN, et al. Logística de implementação de bloco cirúrgico na floresta: atuação do enfermeiro. Revista SOBECC. 2016;21(3):162–9.
13.Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas e Espaciais. Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos. Boletim Infoclima Ano 24 de 29 de abril de 2017; Número 4. Available at:http://infoclima.cptec.inpe.br/.
14.WHO. Medical Device Donations: Considerations for Solicitation and Provision Geneva; Author; 2011.
15.Cassano-Piché A, Trbovich P, Griffin M, et al. Human factors for health technology safety: evaluating and improving the use of health technology in the real world. In: Task Analysis, 11th edition. Toronto: HumanEra, Global Centre for eHealth Innovation. University Health Network; 2015:54–62.
16.Boehm BW. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 1988;21(5):61–72.
17.McGuire N. Monitoring in the field. BJA: Br J Anaesth 2006;97(1):46–56.