Adhesion Characteristics of HAp Functional Coatings onto 3D-Printed Ti-6Al-4V and PEEK IPCs for Enhanced Bioactivity
Main Article Content
Keywords
Biomedical implants, HAp coating, PEEK, Ti-6Al-4V, Biomimetic deposition, Osteointegration
Abstract
The current study probes the growth and characterization of composite hydroxyapatite (HAp) coatings on titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V, Grade 5 titanium) + polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates by a biomimetic deposition technique. HAp coatings were deposited on three titanium-based substrates: solid Ti-6Al-4V, three-dimensional printed porous Ti-6Al-4V, and interpenetrating composites (IPCs) Ti-6Al-4V + PEEK utilizing 10× concentrated simulated body fluid (SBF) buffered in tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS or tromethamine) solution at physiological temperature (37 ℃). Analysis of adhesion strength was carried out for assessing the mechanical bonding behavior of HAp coating with various substrate configurations. Surface analysis methods, such as scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometry, established the growth of crystalline HAp with morphology similar to bone with all substrates. The findings proved that porous Ti-6Al-4V substrates had better adhesion strength through increased mechanical interlocking, and composite Ti-6Al-4V + PEEK substrates had a better stress distribution and a lower interface mismatch. The values of adhesion strength were from 16.6 ± 2.0 megapascal (MPa) for non-treated coatings to 30.0 ± 2.0 MPa for optimized composite coatings, greatly surpassing the minimum clinical requirements of ≥ 10 MPa. The displaced biomimetic HAp coatings enhanced wettability, better corrosion resistance, and increased apatite formation in SBF, relative to uncoated substrates. These results indicate that composite HAp coatings on Ti-6Al-4V + PEEK IPCs are a potential method for fabricating superior bioactive implant surfaces with outstanding mechanical and biological performance for orthopedic and dental applications.
Downloads
Abstract 53 | PDF Downloads 28
References
2. Hench, L.L. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceramic Soc. 1991;74(7):1487–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x.
3. LeGeros, R.Z. Calcium Phosphates in Oral Biology and Medicine. In Monographs in Oral Science. Lussi, A., Buzalaf, M.A.R., eds. S. Karger AG: Basel, Switzerland; 1991; Vol. 15, pp. 201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000419232.
4. Kurtz, S.M., Devine, J.N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845–4869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013.
5. Wang, M.. Developing bioactive composite materials for tissue replacement. Biomaterials, 24(13):2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00037-1.
6. de Groot, K., Geesink, R., Klein, C.P., et al. Plasma-sprayed coatings of hydroxylapatite. J Biomed Mat Res. 1987;21(12):1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820211203.
7. Tas, A.C., Bhaduri, S.B. Rapid coating of Ti-6Al-4V at room temperature with a calcium phosphate layer. J Mater Res. 2004;19(10):2742–2749. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2004.0349.
8. Kim, H.M., Himeno, T., Kawashita, M., et al. The mechanism of biomineralization of bone-like apatite onsynthetic hydroxyapatite: an in vitro assessment. J Royal Soc Interf. 2004;1(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2004.0003.
9. Ryan, G., Pandit, A., Apatsidis, D.P. Fabrication of porous titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biomater. 2006;30141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.032.
10. Brown, T., Bao, Q.B., Agrawal, C.M., et al. An in vitro assessment of wear particulate generated from NUBAC: a PEEK-on-PEEK articulating nucleus replacement device: methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions. Spine. 2011;36(26):E1675-E1685. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821ac8a0.
11. Suchanek, W., Yoshimura, M. Processing and properties of hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials for use as hard tissue replacement implants. J Mater Res. 1998;13(1):94–117. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1998.0015.
12. Liu, X., Chu, P.K., Ding, C. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2004;47(3–4):49–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001.
13. Barrere, F., van der Valk, C.M., Dalmeijer, R.A., et al. Osteogenecity of biomimetic apatite coating applied on metal implants. Biomaterials. 2003;24(4):531–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10454.
14. Webster, T.J., Ergun, C., Doremus, R.H., et al. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;51(3):475–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<475::AID-JBM23>3.0.CO;2-9.
15. Ozhukil Kollath, V., Chen, Q., Mullens, S., et al. Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite–alginate on rapid prototyped 3D Ti6Al4V scaffolds. J Mater Sci. 2016;51(5):2338–2346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9543-6.
16. Geesink, R.G.T., de Groot, K., Klein, C.P.A.T. Bonding of bone to apatite-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1988;70(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.70B1.2828374.
17. Yin, C., Zhang, T., Wei, Q., et al. Surface treatment of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants by ultraviolet photofunctionalization for improved osseointegration. Bioact Mater. 2022;7:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.043.
18. Oyane, A., Kim, H.M., Furuya, T., et al. Preparation and assessment of bioactivity of a bone-like apatite/poly(lactic acid) composite. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;64(2):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10426.
19. Balla, V.K., Bodhak, S., Bose, S., et al. Porous tantalum structures for bone implants: fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological properties. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(8):3349–3359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.046.
20. Albayrak, O., El-Atwani, O., Altintas, S. Hydroxyapatite coating on titanium substrate by electrophoretic deposition method: effects of titanium dioxide inner layer on adhesion strength and hydroxyapatite decomposition. Surf Coat Technol. 2008;202(11):2482–2487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.031
21. Bigi, A., Falini, G., Foresti, E., et al. Magnesium influence on hydroxyapatite crystallization. J Inorg Biochem. 1992;46(4):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-0134(88)85004-9.
22. Li, P., Ohtsuki, C., Kokubo, T., et al. The role of hydrated silica, titania, and alumina in inducing apatite on implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820280103.
23. Dorozhkin, S.V. Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. Biomaterials. 2010;31(7):1465–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.050.
24. Bell, K.R., Clement, N.D., Jenkins, P.J., et al. A comparison of the use of uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated bipolar and cemented femoral stems in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a case-control study. Bone Joint J. 2014;96(3):299-305. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B3.32271
25. Li, S., Chen, R., Xu, W., et al. PEEK‐Based Orthopedic Composites and Structures for Orthopedic Repair: A Review. Polym Compos. 2025;46(17):15567–15583. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.70025.
26. Zreiqat, H., Valenzuela, S.M., Nissan, B.B., et al. The effect of surface chemistry modification of titanium alloy on signalling pathways in human osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2005;26(36):7579–7586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.024
27. Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x.
28. Habraken, W., Habibovic, P., Epple, M., et al. Calcium phosphates in biomedical applications: materials for the future? Mater Today. 2016;19(2):69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.008.
29. Vallet-Regí, M., González-Calbet, J.M. Calcium phosphates as substitution of bone tissues. Prog Solid State Chem. 2004;32(1–2):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.07.001.
30. Jarcho, M. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;157:259–278. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198106000-00037.
