Biomedical Implants and Applications: Current Innovative Materials and Regenerative Solutions
Main Article Content
Keywords
Orthopedic implants, Biomaterials, Osseointegration, Titanium alloys, UHMWPE, Ceramics, Surface engineering, Additive manufacturing, Nanomaterials, Bioactive coatings, Biodegradable alloys, Patient-specific design, Smart implants
Abstract
Background: The orthopedic biomedical implants industry is undergoing a surge in demand all over the world due to the growing ageing population, the growing life expectancy, and the growing number of high-impact traumatic injuries. Although the present-day implants used in joint replacement, spinal fixation, and bone regeneration are very effective in enhancing mobility and the quality of life of the patients, biological and mechanical complications tend to reduce the success of implants in the long-term. Stress shielding, osteolysis associated with wear, and biofilm-related infections are still some of the main factors that lead to revision surgeries. Objective: This paper seeks to offer an extensive assessment of the present situation regarding orthopedic implants. It is dedicated to the interaction of material science, biomechanical needs, and high-end surface engineering to respond to current failure modes and suggest a structure of the next-generation regenerative devices. Material and Methods: The systematic review and analysis were done on four main types of materials namely metals, polymers, ceramics and composites. The paper proposes the analysis of the contemporary manufacturing and design technologies integration (AI-driven CAD/CAM systems, additive manufacturing (3D printing) to create patient-tailored geometries, and nanostructured coating deposition). As criteria of evaluation, such factors as the potential of the bio-integration of the material and wear resistance and the biomechanical compatibility between biodegradable metallic alloys and the stimuli-responsible materials as the smart ones was taken into consideration. Results: It is demonstrated in the analysis that the developments in additive manufacturing can enable the production of porous, biomimetic, structures that can reduce the stress shielding greatly because of its comparable elastic modulus to natural bone. Moreover, nanostructured surface layers and the creation of biodegradable alloys (e.g., made of magnesium) has a considerable amount of potential in the stimulation of bone cell adhesion and the minimization of foreign body retention when present over extended periods. It was concluded that the AI implant design phase enhanced the optimization of the implant geometry, thereby decreasing the rate of mechanical failure. Nonetheless, regardless of such technical advances, the key challenges of long-term stability are control of immune response and avoidance of microbial colonization (biofilms). Conclusion: Active regeneration is the future of orthopedics due to the fact that it succeeds the passive fixation. Integration of the multi-scale innovations - nano-engineering to real time monitoring with intelligent systems creates a strategic framework of next-generation implants. The research finds that a combined method of predictive design and infection-resistant materials is the only way to decrease the revision rates and attain high-quality and dynamic clinical results.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 96 | PDF Downloads 48
References
1.Li, S., Man, Z., Zuo, K., et al. Advancement in smart bone implants: the latest multifunctional strategies and synergistic mechanisms for tissue repair and regeneration. Bioactive Mater 2025;51:333–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.05.004.
2.Sun, X., Li, X. Aging and chronic disease: public health challenge and education reform. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1175898. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-8325-2500-5.
3.Todros, S., Todesco, M., Bagno, A. Biomaterials and their biomedical applications: from replacement to regeneration. Processes. 2021;9(11):1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111949.
4.Sharma, S., Kiran, S.R., Kumar, P., et al. Per-Ingvar Brånemark (1929–2014): a homage to the father of osseointegration and modern dentistry. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e68655. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68655.
5.Albrektsson, T., Johansson, C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(Suppl 2):S96–S101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100282.
6.Parithimarkalaignan, S., Padmanabhan, T.V. Osseointegration: an update. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0252-z.
7.Rahmati, M., Lyngstadaas, S.P., Reseland, J.E., et al. Coating doxycycline on titanium-based implants: two in vivo studies. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(4):787–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.05.007.
8.Quinn, J., McFadden, R., Chan, C. W., Carson, L. Titanium for orthopaedic applications: an overview of surface modification to improve biocompatibility and prevent bacterial biofilm formation. IScience. 2020;23(11):101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101745.
9.Sarraf, M., Rezvani Ghomi, E., Alipour, S., et al. A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Bio-design Manuf. 2022;5(2):371–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00170-3.
10.Kim, T., See, C.W., Li, X., et al. 2020 Orthopaedic implants and devices for bone fractures and defects: past, present and perspective. Eng Regen. 2022;1:6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003.
11.Meng, M., Wang, J., Huang, H., et al. 3D printing metal implants in orthopaedic surgery: methods, applications and future prospects. J Orthop Translat. 2023;42:94–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2023.08.004.
12.Al-Shalawi, F.D., Mohamed Ariff, A.H., Jung, D.W., et al. Biomaterials as implants in the orthopaedic field for regenerative medicine: metal versus synthetic polymers. Polymers. 2023;15(12):2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122601.
13.Naghavi, S.A., Lin, C., Sun, C., et al. Stress shielding and bone resorption of press-fit polyether–ether–ketone (PEEK) hip prosthesis: a sawbone model study. Polymers. 2022;14(21):4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214600.
14.Hussain, M., Khan, S.M., Shafiq, M., et al. Advances in biodegradable materials: degradation mechanisms, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility for orthopaedic applications. Heliyon. 2024;10(12): e32713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32713.
15.Karuppiah, K.K., Bruck, A.L., Sundararajan, S., et al. Friction and wear behavior of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene as a function of polymer crystallinity. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(5):1401–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.022.
16.Dalli, D., Buhagiar, J., Mollicone, P., et al. A novel hip joint prosthesis with uni-directional articulations for reduced wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mat. 2022;127:105072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105072.
17.Bhoi, S., Prasad, A., Kumar, A., et al. Experimental study to evaluate the wear performance of UHMWPE and XLPE material for orthopedics application. Bioengineering. 2022;9(11):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9110676.
18.Insua, A., Galindo-Moreno, P., Miron, R. J., et al. Emerging factors affecting peri‐implant bone metabolism. Periodontol 2000. 2024;94(1):27–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12532.
19.Couto, M., Vasconcelos, D.P., Sousa, D.M., et al. The mechanisms underlying the biological response to wear debris in periprosthetic inflammation. Front Mater. 2020;7:274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00274.
20.Kelvin-Agwu, M.C., Adelodun, M.O., Igwama, G.T., et al. Advancements in biomedical device implants: a comprehensive review of current technologies. Int J Front Med Surg Res. 2024;6(01):019–028. https://doi.org/10.53294/ijfmsr.2024.6.1.0037.
21.Bandyopadhyay, A., Mitra, I., Goodman, S.B., et al. Improving biocompatibility for next generation of metallic implants. Prog Mater Sci. 2023;133:101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101053.
22.Chen, Q., Thouas, G.A. Metallic implant biomaterials. Maters Sci Eng R Rep. 2015;87:1–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.046
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001.
23.Prakasam, M., Locs, J., Salma-Ancane, K., et al. Biodegradable materials and metallic implants—a review. J Funct Biomater. 2017;8(4):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb8040044.
24.Kohal, R.J., Att, W., Bächle, M., et al. Ceramic abutments and ceramic oral implants. An update. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47(1):224–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00243.x.
25.Teo, A.J., Mishra, A., Park, I., et al. Polymeric biomaterials for medical implants and devices. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(4):454–472. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00429.
26.Frazer, R.Q., Byron, R.T., Osborne, P.B., et al. PMMA: an essential material in medicine and dentistry. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(6):629–639. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i6.60.
27.Evans, S.L., Gregson, P.J. Composite technology in load-bearing orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials. 1998;19(15):1329–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00217-2.
28.Hak, D.J., Mauffrey, C., Seligson, D., et al. Use of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implants in orthopaedic surgery. Orthopaedics. 2014;37(12):825–830. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20141124-05.
29.Gautam, S., Bhatnagar, D., Bansal, D., et al. Recent advancements in nanomaterials for biomedical implants. Biomed Eng Adv. 2022;3:100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2022.100029.
30.Nicholson, J.W. Titanium alloys for dental implants: a review. Prosthesis. 2020;2(2):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis2020011.
31.Kalra, A., Jaggi, N., Jasoria, G., et al. Miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. J Contemp Dental Prac. 2014;14(5):993–999. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1439.
32.Stoilov, M., Shafaghi, R., Stark, H., et al. Influence of implant macro-design, -length, and -diameter on primary implant stability depending on different bone qualities using standard drilling protocols—an in vitro analysis. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(9):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14090469.
33.Qi, P., Maitz, M.F., Huang, N. Surface modification of cardiovascular materials and implants. Surf Coat. Technol. 2013;233:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.008.
34.Levy, R.J., Schoen, F.J., Anderson, H.C., et al. Cardiovascular implant calcification: a survey and update. Biomaterials. 1991;12(8):707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90017-5.
35.Kozai, T.D., Jaquins-Gerstl, A.S., Vazquez, A.L., et al. Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;6(1):48–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn500256e.
36.Hassler, C., Boretius, T., Stieglitz, T. Polymers for neural implants. J Polym Sci B Polym Phy. 2011;49(1):18–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.22169.
37.Baino, F., Perero, S., Ferraris, S., et al. Biomaterials for orbital implants and ocular prostheses: overview and future prospects. Actabiomaterialia. 2014;10(3):1064–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.014.
38.Tanveer, W., Ridwan-Pramana, A., Molinero-Mourelle, P., et al. Systematic review of clinical applications of CAD/CAM technology for craniofacial implants placement and manufacturing of orbital prostheses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111349.
39.Moghadasi, K., Isa, M.S.M., Ariffin, M.A., et al. A review on biomedical implant materials and the effect of friction stir based techniques on their mechanical and tribological properties. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;17:1054–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.050.
40.Eftekhar Ashtiani, R., Alam, M., Tavakolizadeh, S., et al. The role of biomaterials and biocompatible materials in implant‐supported dental prosthesis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021(1):3349433. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3349433.
41.Khalid, S., Gao, A., Wang, G., et al. Tuning surface topographies on biomaterials to control bacterial infection. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(24):6840–6857. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00845A.
42.Thakur, A., Kumar, A., Kaya, S., et al. Recent advancements in surface modification, characterisation and functionalisation for enhancing the biocompatibility and corrosion resistance of biomedical implants. Coatings. 2022;12(10):1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101459.
43.Li, J., Zhou, P., Attarilar, S., Shi, H. Innovative surface modification procedures to achieve micro/nano-graded Ti-based biomedical alloys and implants. Coatings. 2021;11(6):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060647.
44.Rasouli, R., Barhoum, A., Uludag, H. A review of nanostructured surfaces and materials for dental implants: surface coating, patterning and functionalisation for improved performance. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(6):1312–1338. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM00021B.
45.Saad, K.S.K., Saba, T., Rashid, A.B. Application of PVD coatings in medical implantology for enhanced performance, biocompatibility, and quality of life. Heliyon. 2024;10(16):e35541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35541.
46.Saba, T., Saad, K.S.K., Rashid, A.B. Precise surface engineering: leveraging chemical vapor deposition for enhanced biocompatibility and durability in biomedical implants. Heliyon. 2024;10(18):e37976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37976.
47.Bohara, S., Suthakorn, J. Surface coating of orthopaedic implant to enhance the osseointegration and reduction of bacterial colonisation: a review. Biomater Res. 2022;26(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-022-00269-3.
48.Song, X., Tang, Z., Liu, W., et al. Biomaterials and regulatory science. J Mater Sci Technol. 2022;128:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.018.
49.Williams, D.F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941–2953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023.
50.Anselme, K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21(7):667–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2.
51.Paital, S.R., Dahotre, N.B. Calcium phosphate coatings for bio-implant applications: materials, performance factors, and methodologies. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2009;66(1–3):1–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2009.05.001.
52.Rezwan, K., Chen, Q.Z., Blaker, J.J., et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(18):3413–3431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039.
53.Middleton, J.C., Tipton, A.J. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopaedic devices. Biomaterials. 2000;21(23):2335–2346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-0.
54.Geetha, M., Singh, A.K., Asokamani, R., et al. Ti-based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants–a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54(3):397–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004.
55.Otsuka, K., Ren, X. Recent developments in the research of shape memory alloys. Intermetallics. 1999;7(5):511–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-9795(98)00070-3.
56.Li, N., Zhang, Q., Gao, S., et al. Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):1604. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01604.
57.Geevarghese, R., Sajjadi, S.S., Hudecki, A., et al. Biodegradable and nonbiodegradable biomaterials and their effect on cell differentiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):16185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416185.
58.Khan, A.R., Grewal, N.S., Zhou, C., et al. Recent advances in biodegradable metals for implant applications: exploring in vivo and in vitro responses. Results Eng (RINENG). 2023;20:101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101526.
59.Thomas, K.K., Zafar, M.N., Pitt, W.G., et al. Biodegradable magnesium alloys for biomedical implants: properties, challenges, and surface modifications with a focus on orthopaedic fixation repair. Appl Sci. 2023;14(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010010.
60.Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., Petrescu, F.I.T. Transforming object design and creation: biomaterials and contemporary manufacturing leading the way. Biomimetics. 2024;9(1):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9010048.
61.Iqbal, S., Sohail, M., Fang, S., et al. Biomaterials evolution: from inert to instructive. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(18):6109–6115. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3BM00322A.
62.Harun-Ur-Rashid, M., Jahan, I., Foyez, T., et al. Bio-inspired nanomaterials for micro/nanodevices: a new era in biomedical applications. Micromachines. 2023;14(9):1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14091786.
63.Vinchurkar, K., Bukke, S.P.N., Jain, P., et al. Advances in sustainable biomaterials: characterisations, and applications in medicine. Discover Polym. 2025;2(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-025-00014-8.
64.Hunde, B.R., Woldeyohannes, A.D. Future prospects of computer-aided design (CAD)—a review from the perspective of artificial intelligence (AI), extended reality, and 3D printing. Results Eng. 2022;14(100478):1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100478.
65.Alghauli, M.A., Aljohani, W., Almutairi, S., et al. Advancements in digital data acquisition and CAD technology in dentistry: innovation, clinical Impact, and promising integration of artificial intelligence. Clin eHealth. 2025;8:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceh.2025.03.001
66.Chang, T.C., Wysk, R.A., Wang, H.P. Computer-Aided Manufacturing. Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ; 1991.
67.Murr, L.E. Global trends in the development of complex, personalised, biomedical, surgical implant devices using 3D printing/additive manufacturing: a review. Med Devices Sens. 2020;3(6):e10126. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds3.10126.
68.Revilla-León, M., Sadeghpour, M., Özcan, M. A review of the applications of additive manufacturing technologies used to fabricate metals in implant dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(7):579–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13212.
69.Hisham, M., Dileep, C., Jacob, L., et al. Additive manufacturing of carbon nanocomposites for structural applications. J Mater Res Technol. 2024;28:4674–4693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.049.
70.Jiang, P., Zhang, Y., Hu, R., et . Advanced surface engineering of titanium materials for biomedical applications: from static modification to dynamic responsive regulation. Bioact Mater. 2023;27:15–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.006.
71.Alexander, R., Liu, X. Soft tissue integration around dental implants: a pressing priority. Biomaterials. 2025;324:123491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123491.
72.Safaei, M., Mohammadi, H., Beddu, S., et al. Surface topography steer soft tissue response and antibacterial function at the transmucosal region of titanium implant. Int J Nanomed. 2024;2024(19):4835–4856. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S461549.
73.Smeets, R., Stadlinger, B., Schwarz, F., et al. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. BioMed Res Int. 2016(1):6285620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6285620.
74.Abdulghafor, M.A., Mahmood, M.K., Tassery, H., et al. Biomimetic coatings in implant dentistry: a quick update. J Funct Biomater. 2023;15(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15010015.
75.Guo, L., Naghavi, S.A., Wang, Z., et al. On the design evolution of hip implants: a review. Mater Design. 2022;216:110552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110552.
76.Buford, A., Goswami, T. Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: paper I–general. Mater Design. 2004;25(5):385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.010.
77.Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., Rohlmann, A., et al. Realistic loads for testing hip implants. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20(2):65–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-2010-0616.
78.Carr, B.C., Goswami, T. Knee implants–review of models and biomechanics. Mater Design. 2010;30(2):398–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.032.
79.Kelmers, E., Szuba, A., King, S.W., et al. Smart knee implants: an overview of current technologies and future possibilities. Indian J Orthop. 2023;57(5):635–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00810-5.
80.Wilson, N.A., Schneller, E.S., Montgomery, K., et al. 2008 Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations. Health Affairs. 2023;27(6):1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1587.
81.Martz, E.O., Goel, V.K., Pope, M.H., et al. Materials and design of spinal implants—a review. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38(3):267–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199723)38:3<267::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-8.
82.Sankar, W.N., Acevedo, D.C., Skaggs, D.L. Comparison of complications among growing spinal implants. Spine. 2010;35(23):2091–2096. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6edd7.
83.Bose, S., Roy, M., Bandyopadhyay, A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005.
84.Donnaloja, F., Jacchetti, E., Soncini, M., et al. Natural and synthetic polymers for bone scaffolds optimisation. Polymers. 2020;12(4):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040905.
85.Roseti, L., Parisi, V., Petretta, M., et al. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;78:1246–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017.
86.Valente, K.P., Brolo, A., Suleman, A. From dermal patch to implants—applications of biocomposites in living tissues. Molecules. 2020;25(3):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030507.
87.Bitar, D., Parvizi, J. Biological response to prosthetic debris. World J Orthop. 2015;6(2):172. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.172.
88.Li, P., Yin, R., Cheng, J., et al. Bacterial biofilm formation on biomaterials and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411680.
89.Amirtharaj Mosas, K.K., Chandrasekar, A.R., Dasan, A., et al. Recent advancements in materials and coatings for biomedical implants. Gels. 2022;8(5):323. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8050323.
90.Shree, P., Singh, C.K., Sodhi, K.K., et al. Biofilms: understanding the structure and contribution towards bacterial resistance in antibiotics. Med Microecol. 2023;16:100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2023.100084.
91.Khan, P.D., Khahro, S.H. Advancement in biomedical implant materials – a mini review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1400918.
92.Wang, D., Wang, L., Liu, Q., et al. 2025 Virulence factors in biofilm formation and therapeutic strategies for Staphylococcus aureus: a review. Anim Zoonoses. 2023;1(2):188–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.azn.2024.11.003.
93.Kalia, V.C., Patel, S.K., Lee, J.K. Bacterial biofilm inhibitors: an overview. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2023;264:115389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115389.
94.Büdinger, L., Hertl, M., Büdinger, L. Immunologic mechanisms in hypersensitivity reactions to metal ions: an overview. Allergy. 2000;55(2):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00107.x.
96.95. Nutan, B., Chandel, A.K.S., Mishra, A. Drug development process: clinical trials and regulations. In: Viral Diseases: History and New Developments in Diagnostics and Therapeutics. IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK; 2025, pp. 4–1. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-4987-1ch4.Patel, V. Pharmaceutical Science-Quality, Regulations, and Drug Development. Cipher Publisher: Bhopal, India; 2024.
97.Cong, B., Zhang, H. Innovative 3D printing technologies and advanced materials revolutionising orthopedic surgery: current applications and future directions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1542179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1542179.
98.Rana, M., Karmakar, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Roychowdhury, A. Design and manufacturing of patient-specific Ti6Al4V implants with inhomogeneous porosity. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;143:105925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105925.
99.Akhtar, M.N., Haleem, A., Javaid, M., et al. Artificial intelligence-based orthopaedic perpetual design. J Clin Orthopaed Trauma. 2024;49:102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102356.
100.Lynch, C.R., Kondiah, P.P., Choonara, Y.E. Advanced strategies for tissue engineering in regenerative medicine: a biofabrication and biopolymer perspective. Molecules. 2021;26(9):2518. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092518.
101.Gaobotse, G., Mbunge, E., Batani, J., et al. Noninvasive smart implants in healthcare: redefining healthcare services delivery through sensors and emerging digital health technologies. Sensors Int. 2022;3:100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2022.100156.
102.Ali, F., Kalva, S.N., Koc, M. Advancements in 3D printing techniques for biomedical applications: a comprehensive review of materials consideration, post processing, applications, and challenges. Discover Mater. 2024;4(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-024-00115-4.
103.Kennedy, S.M., K, A., V, E., Rb, J. R. Transformative applications of additive manufacturing in biomedical engineering: bioprinting to surgical innovations. J Med Eng Technol. 2024;48(4):151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2024.2399017.
2.Sun, X., Li, X. Aging and chronic disease: public health challenge and education reform. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1175898. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-8325-2500-5.
3.Todros, S., Todesco, M., Bagno, A. Biomaterials and their biomedical applications: from replacement to regeneration. Processes. 2021;9(11):1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111949.
4.Sharma, S., Kiran, S.R., Kumar, P., et al. Per-Ingvar Brånemark (1929–2014): a homage to the father of osseointegration and modern dentistry. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e68655. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68655.
5.Albrektsson, T., Johansson, C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(Suppl 2):S96–S101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100282.
6.Parithimarkalaignan, S., Padmanabhan, T.V. Osseointegration: an update. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0252-z.
7.Rahmati, M., Lyngstadaas, S.P., Reseland, J.E., et al. Coating doxycycline on titanium-based implants: two in vivo studies. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(4):787–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.05.007.
8.Quinn, J., McFadden, R., Chan, C. W., Carson, L. Titanium for orthopaedic applications: an overview of surface modification to improve biocompatibility and prevent bacterial biofilm formation. IScience. 2020;23(11):101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101745.
9.Sarraf, M., Rezvani Ghomi, E., Alipour, S., et al. A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Bio-design Manuf. 2022;5(2):371–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00170-3.
10.Kim, T., See, C.W., Li, X., et al. 2020 Orthopaedic implants and devices for bone fractures and defects: past, present and perspective. Eng Regen. 2022;1:6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003.
11.Meng, M., Wang, J., Huang, H., et al. 3D printing metal implants in orthopaedic surgery: methods, applications and future prospects. J Orthop Translat. 2023;42:94–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2023.08.004.
12.Al-Shalawi, F.D., Mohamed Ariff, A.H., Jung, D.W., et al. Biomaterials as implants in the orthopaedic field for regenerative medicine: metal versus synthetic polymers. Polymers. 2023;15(12):2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122601.
13.Naghavi, S.A., Lin, C., Sun, C., et al. Stress shielding and bone resorption of press-fit polyether–ether–ketone (PEEK) hip prosthesis: a sawbone model study. Polymers. 2022;14(21):4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214600.
14.Hussain, M., Khan, S.M., Shafiq, M., et al. Advances in biodegradable materials: degradation mechanisms, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility for orthopaedic applications. Heliyon. 2024;10(12): e32713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32713.
15.Karuppiah, K.K., Bruck, A.L., Sundararajan, S., et al. Friction and wear behavior of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene as a function of polymer crystallinity. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(5):1401–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.022.
16.Dalli, D., Buhagiar, J., Mollicone, P., et al. A novel hip joint prosthesis with uni-directional articulations for reduced wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mat. 2022;127:105072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105072.
17.Bhoi, S., Prasad, A., Kumar, A., et al. Experimental study to evaluate the wear performance of UHMWPE and XLPE material for orthopedics application. Bioengineering. 2022;9(11):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9110676.
18.Insua, A., Galindo-Moreno, P., Miron, R. J., et al. Emerging factors affecting peri‐implant bone metabolism. Periodontol 2000. 2024;94(1):27–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12532.
19.Couto, M., Vasconcelos, D.P., Sousa, D.M., et al. The mechanisms underlying the biological response to wear debris in periprosthetic inflammation. Front Mater. 2020;7:274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00274.
20.Kelvin-Agwu, M.C., Adelodun, M.O., Igwama, G.T., et al. Advancements in biomedical device implants: a comprehensive review of current technologies. Int J Front Med Surg Res. 2024;6(01):019–028. https://doi.org/10.53294/ijfmsr.2024.6.1.0037.
21.Bandyopadhyay, A., Mitra, I., Goodman, S.B., et al. Improving biocompatibility for next generation of metallic implants. Prog Mater Sci. 2023;133:101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101053.
22.Chen, Q., Thouas, G.A. Metallic implant biomaterials. Maters Sci Eng R Rep. 2015;87:1–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.046
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001.
23.Prakasam, M., Locs, J., Salma-Ancane, K., et al. Biodegradable materials and metallic implants—a review. J Funct Biomater. 2017;8(4):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb8040044.
24.Kohal, R.J., Att, W., Bächle, M., et al. Ceramic abutments and ceramic oral implants. An update. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47(1):224–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00243.x.
25.Teo, A.J., Mishra, A., Park, I., et al. Polymeric biomaterials for medical implants and devices. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(4):454–472. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00429.
26.Frazer, R.Q., Byron, R.T., Osborne, P.B., et al. PMMA: an essential material in medicine and dentistry. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(6):629–639. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i6.60.
27.Evans, S.L., Gregson, P.J. Composite technology in load-bearing orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials. 1998;19(15):1329–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00217-2.
28.Hak, D.J., Mauffrey, C., Seligson, D., et al. Use of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implants in orthopaedic surgery. Orthopaedics. 2014;37(12):825–830. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20141124-05.
29.Gautam, S., Bhatnagar, D., Bansal, D., et al. Recent advancements in nanomaterials for biomedical implants. Biomed Eng Adv. 2022;3:100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2022.100029.
30.Nicholson, J.W. Titanium alloys for dental implants: a review. Prosthesis. 2020;2(2):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis2020011.
31.Kalra, A., Jaggi, N., Jasoria, G., et al. Miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. J Contemp Dental Prac. 2014;14(5):993–999. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1439.
32.Stoilov, M., Shafaghi, R., Stark, H., et al. Influence of implant macro-design, -length, and -diameter on primary implant stability depending on different bone qualities using standard drilling protocols—an in vitro analysis. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(9):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14090469.
33.Qi, P., Maitz, M.F., Huang, N. Surface modification of cardiovascular materials and implants. Surf Coat. Technol. 2013;233:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.008.
34.Levy, R.J., Schoen, F.J., Anderson, H.C., et al. Cardiovascular implant calcification: a survey and update. Biomaterials. 1991;12(8):707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90017-5.
35.Kozai, T.D., Jaquins-Gerstl, A.S., Vazquez, A.L., et al. Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;6(1):48–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn500256e.
36.Hassler, C., Boretius, T., Stieglitz, T. Polymers for neural implants. J Polym Sci B Polym Phy. 2011;49(1):18–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.22169.
37.Baino, F., Perero, S., Ferraris, S., et al. Biomaterials for orbital implants and ocular prostheses: overview and future prospects. Actabiomaterialia. 2014;10(3):1064–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.014.
38.Tanveer, W., Ridwan-Pramana, A., Molinero-Mourelle, P., et al. Systematic review of clinical applications of CAD/CAM technology for craniofacial implants placement and manufacturing of orbital prostheses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111349.
39.Moghadasi, K., Isa, M.S.M., Ariffin, M.A., et al. A review on biomedical implant materials and the effect of friction stir based techniques on their mechanical and tribological properties. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;17:1054–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.050.
40.Eftekhar Ashtiani, R., Alam, M., Tavakolizadeh, S., et al. The role of biomaterials and biocompatible materials in implant‐supported dental prosthesis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021(1):3349433. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3349433.
41.Khalid, S., Gao, A., Wang, G., et al. Tuning surface topographies on biomaterials to control bacterial infection. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(24):6840–6857. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00845A.
42.Thakur, A., Kumar, A., Kaya, S., et al. Recent advancements in surface modification, characterisation and functionalisation for enhancing the biocompatibility and corrosion resistance of biomedical implants. Coatings. 2022;12(10):1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101459.
43.Li, J., Zhou, P., Attarilar, S., Shi, H. Innovative surface modification procedures to achieve micro/nano-graded Ti-based biomedical alloys and implants. Coatings. 2021;11(6):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060647.
44.Rasouli, R., Barhoum, A., Uludag, H. A review of nanostructured surfaces and materials for dental implants: surface coating, patterning and functionalisation for improved performance. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(6):1312–1338. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM00021B.
45.Saad, K.S.K., Saba, T., Rashid, A.B. Application of PVD coatings in medical implantology for enhanced performance, biocompatibility, and quality of life. Heliyon. 2024;10(16):e35541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35541.
46.Saba, T., Saad, K.S.K., Rashid, A.B. Precise surface engineering: leveraging chemical vapor deposition for enhanced biocompatibility and durability in biomedical implants. Heliyon. 2024;10(18):e37976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37976.
47.Bohara, S., Suthakorn, J. Surface coating of orthopaedic implant to enhance the osseointegration and reduction of bacterial colonisation: a review. Biomater Res. 2022;26(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-022-00269-3.
48.Song, X., Tang, Z., Liu, W., et al. Biomaterials and regulatory science. J Mater Sci Technol. 2022;128:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.018.
49.Williams, D.F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941–2953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023.
50.Anselme, K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21(7):667–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2.
51.Paital, S.R., Dahotre, N.B. Calcium phosphate coatings for bio-implant applications: materials, performance factors, and methodologies. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2009;66(1–3):1–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2009.05.001.
52.Rezwan, K., Chen, Q.Z., Blaker, J.J., et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(18):3413–3431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039.
53.Middleton, J.C., Tipton, A.J. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopaedic devices. Biomaterials. 2000;21(23):2335–2346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-0.
54.Geetha, M., Singh, A.K., Asokamani, R., et al. Ti-based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants–a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54(3):397–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004.
55.Otsuka, K., Ren, X. Recent developments in the research of shape memory alloys. Intermetallics. 1999;7(5):511–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-9795(98)00070-3.
56.Li, N., Zhang, Q., Gao, S., et al. Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):1604. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01604.
57.Geevarghese, R., Sajjadi, S.S., Hudecki, A., et al. Biodegradable and nonbiodegradable biomaterials and their effect on cell differentiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):16185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416185.
58.Khan, A.R., Grewal, N.S., Zhou, C., et al. Recent advances in biodegradable metals for implant applications: exploring in vivo and in vitro responses. Results Eng (RINENG). 2023;20:101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101526.
59.Thomas, K.K., Zafar, M.N., Pitt, W.G., et al. Biodegradable magnesium alloys for biomedical implants: properties, challenges, and surface modifications with a focus on orthopaedic fixation repair. Appl Sci. 2023;14(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010010.
60.Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., Petrescu, F.I.T. Transforming object design and creation: biomaterials and contemporary manufacturing leading the way. Biomimetics. 2024;9(1):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9010048.
61.Iqbal, S., Sohail, M., Fang, S., et al. Biomaterials evolution: from inert to instructive. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(18):6109–6115. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3BM00322A.
62.Harun-Ur-Rashid, M., Jahan, I., Foyez, T., et al. Bio-inspired nanomaterials for micro/nanodevices: a new era in biomedical applications. Micromachines. 2023;14(9):1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14091786.
63.Vinchurkar, K., Bukke, S.P.N., Jain, P., et al. Advances in sustainable biomaterials: characterisations, and applications in medicine. Discover Polym. 2025;2(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-025-00014-8.
64.Hunde, B.R., Woldeyohannes, A.D. Future prospects of computer-aided design (CAD)—a review from the perspective of artificial intelligence (AI), extended reality, and 3D printing. Results Eng. 2022;14(100478):1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100478.
65.Alghauli, M.A., Aljohani, W., Almutairi, S., et al. Advancements in digital data acquisition and CAD technology in dentistry: innovation, clinical Impact, and promising integration of artificial intelligence. Clin eHealth. 2025;8:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceh.2025.03.001
66.Chang, T.C., Wysk, R.A., Wang, H.P. Computer-Aided Manufacturing. Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ; 1991.
67.Murr, L.E. Global trends in the development of complex, personalised, biomedical, surgical implant devices using 3D printing/additive manufacturing: a review. Med Devices Sens. 2020;3(6):e10126. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds3.10126.
68.Revilla-León, M., Sadeghpour, M., Özcan, M. A review of the applications of additive manufacturing technologies used to fabricate metals in implant dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(7):579–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13212.
69.Hisham, M., Dileep, C., Jacob, L., et al. Additive manufacturing of carbon nanocomposites for structural applications. J Mater Res Technol. 2024;28:4674–4693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.049.
70.Jiang, P., Zhang, Y., Hu, R., et . Advanced surface engineering of titanium materials for biomedical applications: from static modification to dynamic responsive regulation. Bioact Mater. 2023;27:15–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.006.
71.Alexander, R., Liu, X. Soft tissue integration around dental implants: a pressing priority. Biomaterials. 2025;324:123491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123491.
72.Safaei, M., Mohammadi, H., Beddu, S., et al. Surface topography steer soft tissue response and antibacterial function at the transmucosal region of titanium implant. Int J Nanomed. 2024;2024(19):4835–4856. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S461549.
73.Smeets, R., Stadlinger, B., Schwarz, F., et al. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. BioMed Res Int. 2016(1):6285620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6285620.
74.Abdulghafor, M.A., Mahmood, M.K., Tassery, H., et al. Biomimetic coatings in implant dentistry: a quick update. J Funct Biomater. 2023;15(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15010015.
75.Guo, L., Naghavi, S.A., Wang, Z., et al. On the design evolution of hip implants: a review. Mater Design. 2022;216:110552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110552.
76.Buford, A., Goswami, T. Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: paper I–general. Mater Design. 2004;25(5):385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.010.
77.Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., Rohlmann, A., et al. Realistic loads for testing hip implants. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20(2):65–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-2010-0616.
78.Carr, B.C., Goswami, T. Knee implants–review of models and biomechanics. Mater Design. 2010;30(2):398–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.032.
79.Kelmers, E., Szuba, A., King, S.W., et al. Smart knee implants: an overview of current technologies and future possibilities. Indian J Orthop. 2023;57(5):635–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00810-5.
80.Wilson, N.A., Schneller, E.S., Montgomery, K., et al. 2008 Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations. Health Affairs. 2023;27(6):1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1587.
81.Martz, E.O., Goel, V.K., Pope, M.H., et al. Materials and design of spinal implants—a review. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38(3):267–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199723)38:3<267::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-8.
82.Sankar, W.N., Acevedo, D.C., Skaggs, D.L. Comparison of complications among growing spinal implants. Spine. 2010;35(23):2091–2096. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6edd7.
83.Bose, S., Roy, M., Bandyopadhyay, A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005.
84.Donnaloja, F., Jacchetti, E., Soncini, M., et al. Natural and synthetic polymers for bone scaffolds optimisation. Polymers. 2020;12(4):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040905.
85.Roseti, L., Parisi, V., Petretta, M., et al. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;78:1246–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017.
86.Valente, K.P., Brolo, A., Suleman, A. From dermal patch to implants—applications of biocomposites in living tissues. Molecules. 2020;25(3):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030507.
87.Bitar, D., Parvizi, J. Biological response to prosthetic debris. World J Orthop. 2015;6(2):172. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.172.
88.Li, P., Yin, R., Cheng, J., et al. Bacterial biofilm formation on biomaterials and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411680.
89.Amirtharaj Mosas, K.K., Chandrasekar, A.R., Dasan, A., et al. Recent advancements in materials and coatings for biomedical implants. Gels. 2022;8(5):323. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8050323.
90.Shree, P., Singh, C.K., Sodhi, K.K., et al. Biofilms: understanding the structure and contribution towards bacterial resistance in antibiotics. Med Microecol. 2023;16:100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2023.100084.
91.Khan, P.D., Khahro, S.H. Advancement in biomedical implant materials – a mini review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1400918.
92.Wang, D., Wang, L., Liu, Q., et al. 2025 Virulence factors in biofilm formation and therapeutic strategies for Staphylococcus aureus: a review. Anim Zoonoses. 2023;1(2):188–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.azn.2024.11.003.
93.Kalia, V.C., Patel, S.K., Lee, J.K. Bacterial biofilm inhibitors: an overview. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2023;264:115389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115389.
94.Büdinger, L., Hertl, M., Büdinger, L. Immunologic mechanisms in hypersensitivity reactions to metal ions: an overview. Allergy. 2000;55(2):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00107.x.
96.95. Nutan, B., Chandel, A.K.S., Mishra, A. Drug development process: clinical trials and regulations. In: Viral Diseases: History and New Developments in Diagnostics and Therapeutics. IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK; 2025, pp. 4–1. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-4987-1ch4.Patel, V. Pharmaceutical Science-Quality, Regulations, and Drug Development. Cipher Publisher: Bhopal, India; 2024.
97.Cong, B., Zhang, H. Innovative 3D printing technologies and advanced materials revolutionising orthopedic surgery: current applications and future directions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1542179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1542179.
98.Rana, M., Karmakar, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Roychowdhury, A. Design and manufacturing of patient-specific Ti6Al4V implants with inhomogeneous porosity. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;143:105925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105925.
99.Akhtar, M.N., Haleem, A., Javaid, M., et al. Artificial intelligence-based orthopaedic perpetual design. J Clin Orthopaed Trauma. 2024;49:102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102356.
100.Lynch, C.R., Kondiah, P.P., Choonara, Y.E. Advanced strategies for tissue engineering in regenerative medicine: a biofabrication and biopolymer perspective. Molecules. 2021;26(9):2518. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092518.
101.Gaobotse, G., Mbunge, E., Batani, J., et al. Noninvasive smart implants in healthcare: redefining healthcare services delivery through sensors and emerging digital health technologies. Sensors Int. 2022;3:100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2022.100156.
102.Ali, F., Kalva, S.N., Koc, M. Advancements in 3D printing techniques for biomedical applications: a comprehensive review of materials consideration, post processing, applications, and challenges. Discover Mater. 2024;4(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-024-00115-4.
103.Kennedy, S.M., K, A., V, E., Rb, J. R. Transformative applications of additive manufacturing in biomedical engineering: bioprinting to surgical innovations. J Med Eng Technol. 2024;48(4):151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2024.2399017.
Article Sidebar
Published
Mar 31, 2026
Article Details
How to Cite
Palta, P., Palta, A., & Kumar, V. (2026). Biomedical Implants and Applications: Current Innovative Materials and Regenerative Solutions . Global Clinical Engineering Journal, 8(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v8i1.370
Issue
Section
Special Issue Review Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) must obtain all parties consent [co-author(s), others if applicable] and submit the acceptance of Copyright Agreement with their paper. Written permission must be obtained by the author for material that has been published in copyrighted material; this includes tables, figures, and quoted text that exceeds 150 words. A copy of all permissions must accompany the manuscript when published in copyrighted material. The author(s) hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. Author(s) must clearly indicate that approval for publication has been received in cases of institutional ownership.
In all submitted material authors retain all copyrights; however, the GlobalCE Journal reserve the right to reprint all or portions of the article and to post all or part of the article online. GlobalCE Journal reserves the right to edit manuscripts as required to publish in the journal. Authors are responsible for obtaining any and all clearances as appropriate. Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and original work (e.g. first published in the Global Clinical Engineering Journal) is properly cited with the original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on www.Globalce.org well as the copyright and license information must be included. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
