Revolutionizing Healthcare Education: Mobile Virtual Patients for Digital Problem-Based Learning
Main Article Content
Keywords
Mobile virtual patients (MVPs), Poblem-based learning, Clinical reasoning , Usability , Healthcare education
Abstract
The move to student-centered medical curriculum places greater emphasis on active learning and the development of clinical reasoning skills. Virtual Patients, defined as computer-based programs that simulate real-life clinical scenarios, have become increasingly popular as an enhancement to medical training. This study explores the usability and effectiveness of Mobile Virtual Patients (MVPs) in supporting healthcare professionals and medical students to develop skills related to symptom management, diagnosis, and treatment in the context of the H2020 SHAPES project for older adults. Fourteen participants, divided into two groups of seven each from the University of Nicosia and Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, respectively, participated in PBL sessions using MVPs. These cases encompassed various conditions, from neurodegenerative diseases to chronic conditions, focusing on participants active engagement and inquiry-based learning. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Electronic Virtual Patients (eViP) toolkit were applied, which brought usability, technology acceptance, and clinical reasoning into perspective. Results showed high usability, with healthcare professionals giving an SUS of 86.2, compared to 77.5 for medical students. Both groups reported positive experiences, but medical students rated the learning effect and coaching higher than healthcare professionals. This suggests that MVPs are valuable instruments in enhancing clinical reasoning and knowledge acquisition. It further emphasizes the customization of MVPs for the various needs of a medical student and a healthcare professional to realize optimized educational outcomes. Future studies should address scalability, infrastructure needs, and inclusion in broader medical curricula to further advance the spread within healthcare education.
Downloads
Abstract 770 | PDF Downloads 224
References
2. Dafli, E., Fountoukidis, I., Hatzisevastou-Loukidou, C., et al. Curricular integration of virtual patients: a unifying perspective of medical teachers and students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1849-7.
3. Cardoso, S.A., Suyambu, J., Iqbal, J., et al. Exploring the Role of Simulation Training in Improving Surgical Skills Among Residents: A Narrative Review. Cu-reus. 2023;15(9): e44654. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44654.
4. Moll-Khosrawi, P., Zöllner, C., Cencin, N., et al. Flipped learning enhances non-technical skill performance in simulation-based education: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4465410.1186/s12909-021-02766-w.
5. Peddle, M., Mckenna, L., Bearman, M., et al. Development of non-technical skills through virtual patients for undergraduate nursing students: An exploratory study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;73:94–101. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4465410.1016/j.nedt.2018.11.008.
6. Senbekov, M., Saliev, T., Bukeyeva, Z., et al. The recent progress and applications of digital technologies in health-care: a review. Int J Telemedicine Appl. 2020;18. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4465410.1155/2020/8830200.
7. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). (2007). Effective use of educational technology in medical education--colloquium on educational technology: recommendations and guidelines for medical educators. Available online: https://designformeded.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/effective-use-of-educational-technology-in-medical-education.pdf.
8. Kononowicz, A.A., Zary, N., Edelbring, S., et al. Virtual patients-what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3.
9. Heinrichs, L., Dev, P., Davies, D. Virtual environments and virtual patients in healthcare. In Healthcare Simulation Education: Nestel, D., Kelly. M., Jolly. B., et al. eds; Wiley: New Jersey, U.S.; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119061656.ch10.
10. Bamidis, P. D. Brain Function Assessment in Learning. In First International Conference, Brain Function Assessment in Learning, Patras, Greece, September 24–25, 2017. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, Germany.
11. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. School of Medicine. Available online: https://aristotlemedical.edu.gr/.
12. ΑΡΙΑΔΝΗ. OpenLabyrinth. Available online: https://vp.med.auth.gr/ariadne.
13. SHAPES Mobile Virtual Patients App. Available online: https://shapes-26bd2.web.app/.
14. SHAPES Project. Available online: https://shapes2020.eu/.
15. Dratsiou, I., Villacañas, O., Cooper, S., et al. Assistive Technologies for Supporting Wellbeing of Older Adults. Technologies. 2022;10(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies10010008.
16. Thessaloniki Action for Health & Wellbeing Living Lab (Thess-AHALL). Available online: https://aha livinglabs.com/.
17. Lewis, J.R. and Sauro, J. The factor structure of the system usability scale. In Human Centered Design: First International Conference, HCD 2009, Held as Part of HCI International 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19–24, 2009. Springer: Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12.
18. Electronic Virtual Patient Project (eViP). Available online: http://virtualpatients.eu/.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) must obtain all parties consent [co-author(s), others if applicable] and submit the acceptance of Copyright Agreement with their paper. Written permission must be obtained by the author for material that has been published in copyrighted material; this includes tables, figures, and quoted text that exceeds 150 words. A copy of all permissions must accompany the manuscript when published in copyrighted material. The author(s) hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. Author(s) must clearly indicate that approval for publication has been received in cases of institutional ownership.
In all submitted material authors retain all copyrights; however, the GlobalCE Journal reserve the right to reprint all or portions of the article and to post all or part of the article online. GlobalCE Journal reserves the right to edit manuscripts as required to publish in the journal. Authors are responsible for obtaining any and all clearances as appropriate. Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and original work (e.g. first published in the Global Clinical Engineering Journal) is properly cited with the original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on www.Globalce.org well as the copyright and license information must be included. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
