Artificial Intelligence and the Future in Knee Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities for Personalized Care

Main Article Content

Luca Andriollo https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1586-2542
Corrado Ciatti
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi
Francesco Benazzo

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Knee arthroplasty, Robotics, Robotic surgery, Cutting-edge arthroplasty

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery, offering new possibilities for improving diagnostic accuracy, enhancing surgical precision, and optimizing patient care. Through machine learning and deep learning algorithms, AI can analyze vast datasets, including medical images and patient histories, to recognize patterns that may be undetectable to the human eye. In orthopedics, AI is increasingly being integrated into preoperative planning, surgical navigation, and robotic-assisted procedures, providing surgeons with tools to perform more accurate interventions while reducing medical errors and physician fatigue. Despite the many benefits, challenges such as ethical considerations, patient privacy concerns, and regulatory requirements need to be addressed to ensure the reliable and safe use of AI in clinical practice. This study highlights AI’s current applications in knee osteoarthritis diagnosis and treatment, its growing role in surgical decision-making, and the potential for machine learning models to personalize treatment plans. Additionally, it discusses the future of AI in healthcare, including the ethical dilemmas posed by autonomous systems and the importance of maintaining human empathy and judgment in patient care. Ultimately, while AI holds immense promise in transforming orthopedics and surgery, its full potential will only be realized through thoughtful integration and responsible use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract 58 | PDF Downloads 26

References

1. Beyaz, S. A brief history of artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in orthopedics & traumatology and future expectations. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(3):653–655. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.75300.
2. Tjardes., T, Heller, R.A., Pförringer, D., er al. Artificial intelligence in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Chirurg. 2020;91(3):201–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-019-01091-9.
3. Dretakis, K., Koutserimpas, C. Pitfalls with the MAKO robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(2):262. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020262.
4. Myers, T.G., Ramkumar, P.N., Ricciardi, B.F., et al. Artificial intelligence and orthopaedics: an introduction for clinicians. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(9):830–840. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01128.
5. Garwood, E.R., Tai, R., Joshi, G., et al. The use of artificial intelligence in the evaluation of knee pathology. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020;24(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400264.
6. Pongsakonpruttikul, N., Angthong, C., Kittichai, V., et al. Artificial intelligence assistance in radiographic detection and classification of knee osteoarthritis and its severity: a cross-sectional diagnostic study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(5):1549–1558. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202203_28220.
7. Nehrer, S., Ljuhar, R., Steindl, P., et al. Automated knee osteoarthritis assessment increases physicians’ agreement rate and accuracy: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Cartilage. 2021;13(1 Suppl):957S–965S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603519888793.
8. Chaudhari, A.S., Grissom, M.J., Fang, Z., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative multicontrast 5-minute knee MRI using prospective artificial intelligence image quality enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216(6):1614–1625. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.24172.
9. Kaya Bicer, E., Fangerau, H., Sur, H. Artifical intelligence use in orthopedics: an ethical point of view. EFORT Open Rev. 2023;8(8):592–596. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0083.
10. Andriollo, L., Picchi, A., Sangaletti, R., et al. The role of artificial intelligence in anterior cruciate ligament injuries: current concepts and future perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(3):300. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030300.
11. Franceschetti, E., Gregori, P., De Giorgi, S., et al. Machine learning can predict anterior elevation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a new tool for daily outpatient clinic? Musculoskelet Surg. 2024;108(2):163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-023-00811-z.
12. Rainey, J., Sodhi, N., Gililland, J.M., et al. The growing role of artificial intelligence and technology in hip and knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2024;44:251-256. https://doi.org/10.52198/24.STI.44.OS1809.
13. Rossi, S.M.P., Sangaletti, R., Andriollo, L., et al. The use of a modern robotic system for the treatment of severe knee deformities. Technol Health Care. 2024;32(5):3737–3746. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-231261.
14. Andriollo, L., Pietramala, S., Polizzi, A., et al. Computer-assisted navigation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: surgical experience and clinical outcomes. J Clin Med. 2024;13(9):2512. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092512.
15. Hasan, S., Ahmed, A., Waheed, M.A., et al. Transforming orthopedic joint surgeries: the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43289. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43289.
16. Kayani, B., Konan, S., Tahmassebi, J., et al. Robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(7):930–937. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1.
17. Lee, L.S., Chan, P.K., Wen, C., et al. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and prediction of arthroplasty outcomes: a review. Arthroplasty. 2022;4(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00118-7.
18. Farrow, L., Ashcroft, G.P., Zhong, M., et al. Using artificial intelligence to revolutionise the patient care pathway in hip and knee arthroplasty (ARCHERY): protocol for the development of a clinical prediction model. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022;11(5):e37092. https://doi.org/10.2196/37092.
19. Batailler, C., Shatrov, J., Sappey-Marinier, E., et al. Artificial intelligence in knee arthroplasty: current concept of the available clinical applications. Arthroplasty. 2022;4(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00119-6.
20. Karnuta, J.M., Luu, B.C., Roth, A.L., et al. Artificial intelligence to identify arthroplasty implants from radiographs of the knee. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(3):935–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.021.
21. Rossi, S.M.P., Panzera, R.M., Sangaletti, R., et al. Problems and opportunities of a smartphone-based care management platform: application of the Wald principles to a survey-based analysis of patients’ perception in a pilot center. Healthcare. 2024;12(2):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12020153.