Effectiveness of Robotic Rehabilitation in the Management of Stroke Patients—A Literature Review
Main Article Content
Keywords
Stroke, Gait, Robotic rehabilitation, Upper limb rehabilitation, Cognitive ability , Balance
Abstract
Background and Objective: Stroke is considered a root cause of disability worldwide, adversely affecting movement and balance. It requires comprehensive rehabilitation to achieve maximum recovery. Gait training, including robot-assisted methods, is crucial in restoring independence among stroke survivors. Balance impairment leads to challenges that demand specialized interventions, while cognitive deficits add complexity to rehabilitation. Despite ongoing research, optimizing outcomes remains a challenge, urging innovation in trial design and intervention strategies to enhance the effectiveness during stroke rehabilitation. This literature review highlights the evidence regarding the uses and effectiveness of robotic rehabilitation amongst stroke survivors.
Methods: The searches were performed on databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using keywords such as gait, balance, cognitive ability, and upper limb rehabilitation. The inclusion criteria were the studies published in English with a study design of randomized controlled trials focusing on stroke patients. The intervention included robotic rehabilitation. Qualitative data synthesis was gathered after screening the abstracts and full texts of the included articles.
Result: This literature review found that robotic rehabilitation, including intensive and personalized sessions, targeted resistance, augmented feedback, and sensory inputs, yields significant improvements across multiple domains for stroke patients. These improvements include enhanced gait parameters, balance, cognitive abilities, and upper limb functionality. Robotic-assisted therapy can improve motor function, coordination, memory, attention, and sensory perception, ultimately contributing to better recovery and quality of life for individuals affected by stroke.
Conclusion: This study concluded that combining robotic rehabilitation with other techniques can provide enhanced benefits compared to conventional rehabilitation. However, more studies are required to reach any firm conclusion.
Downloads
References
2.Kim, S.Y., Yang, L., Park, I.J., et al. Effects of innovative WALKBOT robotic-assisted locomotor training on balance and gait recovery in hemiparetic stroke: a prospective, randomized, experimenter blinded case control study with a four-week follow-up. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23(4):636–642. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2404936.
3.Rojek, A., Mika, A., Oleksy, Ł., et al. Effects of exoskeleton gait training on balance, load distribution, and functional status in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2020;10:1344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01344.
4.Li, D.X., Zha, F.B., Long, J.J., et al. Effect of Robot Assisted Gait Training on Motor and Walking Function in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Random Controlled Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(7):105807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105807.
5.Jang, S.H., Lee, J.H. Impact of sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients: Sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients. Open Med (Wars). 2016;11(1):330–335. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0061.
6.Wang, Y.J., Mukaino, M., Ohtsuka, K., et al. Gait characteristics of post-stroke hemiparetic patients with different walking speeds. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020;43(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000391.
7.Verma, R., Arya, K.N., Sharma, P., et al. Understanding gait control in post-stroke: implications for management. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.12.005.
8.Rost, N.S., Brodtmann, A., Pase, M.P., et al. Post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia. Circ Res. 2022;130(8):1252–1271. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.319951.
9.Stinear, C.M., Lang, C.E., Zeiler, S., et al. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6.
10.Kim, E., Lee, G., Lee, J., et al. Simultaneous high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in stroke patients. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):4483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53482-6.
11.Longatelli, V., Pedrocchi, A., Guanziroli, E., et al. Robotic exoskeleton gait training in stroke: an electromyography-based evaluation. Front Neurorobot. 2021;15:733738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.733738.
12.Maranesi, E., Bevilacqua, R., Di Rosa, M., et al. An innovative training based on robotics for older people with subacute stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):400. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05357-8.
13.Alingh, J.F., Groen, B.E., Kamphuis, J.F. et al. Task-specific training for improving propulsion symmetry and gait speed in people in the chronic phase after stroke: a proof-of-concept study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00858-8.
14.Heng, H,M., Lu, M.K., Chou, L.W., et al. Changes in Balance, Gait and Electroencephalography Oscillations after Robot-Assisted Gait Training: An Exploratory Study in People with Chronic Stroke. Brain Sci 2020;10(11):821. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110821.
15.Kotov, S.V., Isakova, E.V., Lijdvoy, V.Y., et al. Robotic Restoration of Gait Function in Patients in the Early Recovery Period of Stroke. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 2021;51:583–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-021-01109-y.
16.Nolan, K.J., Karunakaran, K.K., Chervin, K., et al. Robotic exoskeleton gait training during acute stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Front Neurorobot. 2020;14:581815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2020.581815.
17.Kim, H.Y., Shin, J.H., Yang, S.P., et al. Robot-assisted gait training for balance and lower extremity function in patients with infratentorial stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0553-5.
18.Kim, J., Kim, D.Y., Chun, M.H., et al. Effects of robot-(Morning Walk®) assisted gait training for patients after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(3):516–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518806563.
19.Giovannini, S., Iacovelli, C., Brau, F., et al. RObotic-Assisted Rehabilitation for balance and gait in Stroke patients (ROAR-S): study protocol for a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):872. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06812-w.
20.Li, C., Wei, J.Y., Huang, X.Q., et al. Effects of a Brain-Computer Interface-Operated Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot on Motor Function Recovery in Patients with Stroke. J Healthc Eng. 2021;4710044. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4710044.
21.Chen, S.C., Lin, C.H., Su, S.W., et al. Feasibility and effect of interactive telerehabilitation on balance in individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00866-8.
22.De Luca, A., Squeri, V., Barone, L.M., et al. Dynamic stability and trunk control improvements following robotic balance and core stability training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2020;11:494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00494.
23.Castelli, L., Iacovelli, C., Loreti, C., et al. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation for balance in stroke patients (ROAR-S): effects of cognitive, motor and functional outcomes. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(17):8198–8211. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202309_33580.
24.Zhao, C.G., Ju, F., Sun, W., et al. Effects of training with a brain-computer interface-controlled robot on rehabilitation outcome in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Neurol Ther. 2022;11(2):679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-022-00333-z.
25.Torrisi, M., Maggio, M.G., De Cola, M.C., et al. Beyond motor recovery after stroke: The role of hand robotic rehabilitation plus virtual reality in improving cognitive function. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;92:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.053.
26.Aprile, I., Guardati, G., Cipollini, V., et al. Robotic rehabilitation: an opportunity to improve cognitive functions in subjects with stroke. An explorative study. Front Neurol. 2020;11:588285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.588285.
27.Manuli, A., Maggio, M.G., Latella, D., et al. Can robotic gait rehabilitation plus Virtual Reality affect cognitive and behavioural outcomes in patients with chronic stroke? A randomized controlled trial involving three different protocols. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(8):104994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104994.
28.Frisoli, A., Barsotti, M., Sotgiu, E., et al. A randomized clinical control study on the efficacy of three-dimensional upper limb robotic exoskeleton training in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00991-y.
29.Takebayashi, T., Takahashi, K., Amano, S., et al. Robot-assisted training as self-training for upper-limb hemiplegia in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2022;53(7):2182–2191. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037260.
30.Budhota, A., Chua, K.S.G., Hussain, A., et al. Robotic assisted upper limb training post stroke: a randomized control trial using combinatory approach toward reducing workforce demands. Front Neurol. 2021;12:622014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.622014.
31.Shi, X.Q., Heung, H.L., Tang, Z.Q., et al. Effects of a soft robotic hand for hand rehabilitation in chronic stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(7):105812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105812.
32.Li, Y.C., Lin, K.C., Chen, C.L., et al. A comparative efficacy study of robotic priming of bilateral approach in stroke rehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2021;12:658567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.658567.
33.Guillén-Climent, S., Garzo, A., Muñoz-Alcaraz, M.N., et al. A usability study in patients with stroke using MERLIN, a robotic system based on serious games for upper limb rehabilitation in the home setting. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00837-z.
34.Ranzani, R., Lambercy, O., Metzger, J.C., et al. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7.
35.Aprile, I., Germanotta, M., Cruciani, A., et al. Upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000295.
36.Huang, Y.H., Nam, C.Y., Li, W.M., et al. A comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of NMES robotic hand training and pure robotic hand training after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2020;56:101723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101723.
37.Franceschini, M., Mazzoleni, S., Goffredo, M., et al. Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation versus physical therapy on subacute stroke patients: A follow-up study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020;24(1):194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.03.016.
38.Qian, Q.Y., Hu, X.L., Lai, Q., et al. Early stroke rehabilitation of the upper limb assisted with an electromyography-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation-robotic arm. Front Neurol. 2017;8:447. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00447.
39.Bruni, M.F., Melegari, C., De Cola, M.C., et al. What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;48:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.048.
40.Zheng, Q.X., Ge, L., Wang, C.C., et al. Robot-assisted therapy for balance function rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;95:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.03.015.
41.Aminov, A., Rogers, J.M., Middleton, S., et al. What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0370-2.
42.Bertani, R., Melegari, C., De Cola, M.C., et al. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(9):1561–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) must obtain all parties consent [co-author(s), others if applicable] and submit the acceptance of Copyright Agreement with their paper. Written permission must be obtained by the author for material that has been published in copyrighted material; this includes tables, figures, and quoted text that exceeds 150 words. A copy of all permissions must accompany the manuscript when published in copyrighted material. The author(s) hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. Author(s) must clearly indicate that approval for publication has been received in cases of institutional ownership.
In all submitted material authors retain all copyrights; however, the GlobalCE Journal reserve the right to reprint all or portions of the article and to post all or part of the article online. GlobalCE Journal reserves the right to edit manuscripts as required to publish in the journal. Authors are responsible for obtaining any and all clearances as appropriate. Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and original work (e.g. first published in the Global Clinical Engineering Journal) is properly cited with the original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on www.Globalce.org well as the copyright and license information must be included. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
