Sustainable procurement of medical devices in an international context - Part 3 Assessment of local and lifelong use conditions

Main Article Content

Valerio Di Virgilio https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8916-8486
Francisco Becerra Posada
Alexia Bouchard Saindon

Keywords

Medical device procurement, sustainable procurement, technical specifications, local conditions, local capacities, lifetime use of MDs, total cost of ownership, health services in developing countries, quality assurance, sustainability, clinical engineer role, international health procurement, value-based procurement

Abstract

Background and Objectives


This article is the third in a series of three manuscripts published in this journal. It aims to describe how sustainable procurement of medical devices (MDs) can be implemented in operational projects in the context of developing countries. It also further details how the biomedical/clinical engineer lead (BCEL) in charge of technical support during the MD procurement process can apply sustainability principles and concepts of value-based procurement.


Material and Methods


Based on the authors’ experience of more than 20 years in procurement projects and implementation of MDs, the role of the BCEL will be developed from a theoretical point of view with the description of the second and third pillars of a sustainable purchase following the needs assessment: the assessment of existing conditions along with local capacities and the evaluation of the use conditions during the lifetime of the medical equipment. The application of these principles in operational projects will be further discussed by analyzing literature and lessons learned from projects implemented in developing countries.


Results/Proposal


The BCEL has a key role in the sustainable procurement of MDs to design the technical specifications of the goods, related services, and post-sales conditions to maximize the benefit of the investment. As the specialist can analyze the local existing conditions and capacities while ensuring efficient use of the MDs during their lifespan, they can contribute to a sustainable implementation of MDs in developing countries.


 


The BCEL shall also be able to analyze the local and international markets to find all possible technological solutions that meet the needs, local conditions, and capacities and ensure quality use during the lifespan of the purchased MD. The BCEL shall have competencies in identifying all the risks related to the use of the MD from the safety risks linked to its installation, use, and maintenance to the sustainability risks linked to obtaining the conditions that guarantee the use of the device and maintaining them as long as possible. Examples of these conditions include the presence of qualified and trained users, availability of maintenance and consumable budgets, availability and maintenance of infrastructure conditions (access, electrical power, water, drainage, medical gasses, etc.), and last but not least, presence of patients requiring a diagnosis or treatment using the purchased MD who were identified during the evaluation of the first pillar: a sound needs assessment.


Conclusion


As an evolution of the BCEL’s traditional biomedical and clinical engineering work, he/she shall assume the responsibility to guarantee the sustainability of the MD purchase. This quality assurance and control role is achieved by a sound theoretical background knowledge based on the three sustainable procurement pillars: the needs, existing and lifetime use conditions assessments, the analysis of the local and international markets, and a broad understanding of sustainability risks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 151 | PDF Downloads 45

References

Di Virgilio, V., Bouchard Saindon, A., & Becerra Posada, F. C. G. (2023). Sustainable procurement of medical devices in an international context: Part 1 - background and definitions. Global Clinical Engineering Journal, 5(3), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v5i3.159
Di Virgilio, V., Bouchard Saindon, A., & Becerra Posada, F. (2023). Sustainable procurement of medical devices in an international context - Part 2. Global Clinical Engineering Journal, 6(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v6i1.165
Access and Delivery Partnership. PATH. Value-based procurement of medical equipment. June 2020. Available at: https://adphealth.org/upload/resource/VBP_Guide_EN_June2020.pdf
Boccato C, Cerutti S, Vienken J, Research for development. Medical Devices Improving Health Care Through a Multidisciplinary Approach. Springer.
UNICEF. Semana Mundial del Parto Respetado. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDjk5O5g3Zs
Sutcliffe KL, Dahlen HG, Newnham E, Levett K.“You are either with me on this or not”: A meta-ethnography of the influence birth partners and care-providers have on coping strategies learned in childbirth education and used by women during labour. Women and Birth. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.001
United Nations Office for Project Services. Procurement Manual. Revision 7. 2021, July 1. Available at: https://content.unops.org/service-Line-Documents/Procurement/UNOPS-Procurement-Manual-2021_EN.pdf
WHO, User Guide: WHO technical specification for medical devices. Version 1.1. 2014. Available at: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/medical-devices/technical-specifications/user-guide.pdf?sfvrsn=2c161505_5&download=true
United Nations Office for Project Services Procurement Group. Sustainable Procurement Framework - Annex 1 to the Procurement Manual. UNOPS. 2021, July 1. Available at: https://content.unops.org/service-Line-Documents/Procurement/UNOPS-Procurement-Manual-Annex-1-2021_EN.pdf
UNICEF. UNICEF Implements Sustainable Procurement. UNICEF Supply Division; September 2018. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/supply/sites/unicef.org.supply/files/2019-06/sustainable-procurement-information-note.pdf
Cheng M. A Strategy to Maintain Essential Medical Equipment in Developing Countries. In: Dyro J. The Clinical Engineering Handbook. Setauket, NY: The biomedical engineering series, Elsevier Academic Press. Chapter 38, pp. 108-113.
WHO. Medical device donations: considerations for solicitation and provision. WHO Medical device technical series. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44568/9789241501408-eng.pdf?sequence=1
Di Virgilio V, Ambrois G. Clinical engineering development in the Uruguayan public health system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010. Available at: thttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21097119/.
Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry. Expected Medical Device Lifetime at a Glance. Available at: https://www.mddionline.com/regulatory-quality/expected-medical-device-lifetime-glance
US Food and Drug Administration. Medical Device Reporting for Manufacturers. November 2016. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/files/medical%20devices/published/Medical-Device-Reporting-for-Manufacturers---Guidance-for-Industry-and-Food-and-Drug-Administration-Staff.pdf
UNICEF. UNICEF Implements Sustainable Procurement. UNICEF Supply Division; September 2018. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/supply/sites/unicef.org.supply/files/2019-06/sustainable-procurement-information-note.pdf
ADP Health. PATH. Value-based procurement of medical equipment. June 2020. Available at: https://adphealth.org/upload/resource/VBP_Guide_EN_June2020.pdf
Mol CR, THET. Final Report of the Medical Equipment (ME) Uptime Project. March 2018. Available at: https://www.thet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/180329-Final-Report-ME-Uptime-Project.pdf
World Health Organization. Decommissioning Medical Devices. WHO Medical Device Technical series. February 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241517041
Hinrichs-Krapels S, Ditewig B, Boulding H, et al. Purchasing high-cost medical devices and equipment in hospitals: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2022. Available at: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e057516
David Y, Jahnke EG. Planning Medical Technology Management in a Hospital. Global Clinical Engineering Journal 2018;(1), 23–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v0i1.23