Protocol for a Systematic Review on the Application of Robotics in Orthodontic Treatments

Main Article Content

Guillermo Cano-Verdugo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-1939
Myriam Angélica De la Garza-Ramos https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-3695
Omosebi Temitope Olabisi https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8643-8346
Yinli Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7606-8229
Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha
María Natividad Ávila-Ortíz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-4000
Karina Janett Hernández-Ruiz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-4430

Keywords

Robotics, Orthodontics, Clinical application, Surgical orthodontics, Orthodontic wire bending, Systematic review, Dental technology, Innovative orthodontics

Abstract

Background and Objective: Robotics have multiple uses in dentistry, especially within the field of orthodontics, though the possible applications of these innovative systems are still not well defined. The objective of this systematic review protocol will focus on describing the steps to outline the role of robotics in orthodontic treatments and define its functionality and range within clinical applications.


Methods: To achieve this, peer-reviewed studies focusing on the employment of robotic systems in various aspects of orth-odontic treatment will be incorporated, while literature reviews will be not considered. Data will be explored through Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and DOAJ. Potential for bias will be established using the ROBINS-E and certainty assessment with GRADE guidelines.


Results: The main results of the articles included will be tabulated in an Excel spreadsheet, and a detailed narrative summary and interpretation of the data will be produced and displayed based on its use in surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatments.


Conclusion: This systematic review protocol aims to offer important perspectives on the application of robotic systems in orthodontic procedures, contributing to advancement in clinical practices and technological integration. The results may assist practitioners in adopting robotic systems to enhance treatment precision, efficiency, and overall patient care. The literature search will encompass studies from various regions worldwide. This study is self-funded and has been registered on the PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42023463531.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract 783 | PDF Downloads 72

References

1. Grischke, J., Johannsmeier, L., Eich, L., et al. Dentronics: Towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2020;36(6):765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.021.
2. Naniz, M.A., Askari, M., Zolfagharian, A., et al. 4D Printing: a cutting-edge platform for biomedical applications. Biomed Mater. 2022;17(6):062001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ac8e42.
3. Morag, E., Cornelis, F.H., Weisz, G., et al. Overcoming Barriers and Advancements in Endovascular Robotics: A Review of Systems and Developments. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023;26(3):100918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100918.
4. Alexander, S.A., Askari, M., Naniz, M.A., et al. Review on four-dimensional printed parts for dental applications. Mater Des. 2022;222:111056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111056.
5. Ahmad, P., Alam, M.K., Aldajani, A., et al. Dental Robotics: A Disruptive Technology. Sensors. 2021;21(10):3308. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103308.
6. Liu, C., Liu, Y., Xie, R., et al. The evolution of robotics: research and application progress of dental implant robotic systems. Int J Oral Sci. 2024;16(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-024-00296-x.
7. Qiu, Y., Ashok, A., Nguyen, C.C., et al. Integrated Sensors for Soft Medical Robotics. Small. 2024;20(22):e2308805. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202308805.
8. Sabbagh, H., Dotzer, B., Baumert, U., et al. Biomechanical simulation of segmented intrusion of a mandibular canine using Robot Orthodontic Measurement & Simulation System (ROSS). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;160:106720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106720.
9. Nassani, L.M., Javed, K., Amer, R.S., et al. Technology Readiness Level of Robotic Technology and Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review. Surgeries. 2024;5:273–287. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5020025.
10.Ahuja, D., Jose, N.P., Shetty, P. Role of Robotics in Transforming Orthodontic Practice—A Narrative Review. Int J Oral Health. 2024:16(4):283–289. https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_80_24.
11.Liu, H., Jiang, J.G., Li, Y.Z., et al. Structural design and simulation analysis of an orthodontic wire bending robot. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; IEEE; 2023; pp. 1419–1424. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA57826.2023.10215842.
12.Adkins, S.E., Vance, D.T., Dixon, K.S., et al. Making surgical education intuitive: A surgical robotics primer for preclinical medical students. Am J Surg. 2025;239:116057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116057.
13.Page, M., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
14.Frandsen, T.F., Bruun Nielsen, M.F., Lindhardt, C.L., et al. Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;127:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.005.
15.Cano-Verdugo, G., Flores-García, B.D., Núñez-Rocha, G.M., et al. Impact of urban farming on health: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf). 2024;46(3):e500–e509. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae056.
16.Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P.A., et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J. 2004;328(7454):1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
17.Schünemann, H.J., Cuello, C., Akl, E.A., et al. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012.
18.Rethlefsen, M.L. and Page, M.J. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022;110(2):253–257. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
19.Flores-García, B.D., Núñez-Rocha, G.M., Ávila-Ortíz, M.N., et al. Protocol for a systematic review of the health impact of urban farming interventions. Eco Cities. 2024;5(2):2786. https://doi.org/10.54517/ec2786.
20.Muhl, C., Wadge, S., Hussein, T. Social prescribing and students: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One. 202;18(8):e0289981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289981.
21.Bratti, V.F., Wilson, B.E., Fazelzad, R., et al. Scoping review protocol on the impact of antimicrobial resistance on cancer management and outcomes. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e068122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068122.