Protocol for a Systematic Review on the Application of Robotics in Orthodontic Treatments

Main Article Content

Guillermo Cano-Verdugo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-1939
Myriam Angélica De la Garza-Ramos https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-3695
Omosebi Temitope Olabisi https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8643-8346
Yinli Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7606-8229
Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha
María Natividad Ávila-Ortíz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-4000
Karina Janett Hernández-Ruiz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-4430

Keywords

Robotics, Orthodontics, Clinical application, Surgical orthodontics, Orthodontic wire bending, Systematic review, Dental technology, Innovative orthodontics

Abstract

Background and Objective
Robotics have various applications in dentistry, particularly in orthodontics, though the potential use of these technologies remains unclear. The objective of this protocol for a systematic review will be to describe the steps to summarize the application of robotics in orthodontics and to clarify its function and scope in clinical practice.
Material and Methods
To achieve this, original articles addressing the employment of robotics in any area of orthodontic practice will be included, while review articles will be excluded. Data will be searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and DOAJ. The risk of bias will be established using the ROBINS-E and certainty assessment tools with GRADE guidelines.
Results
The main results of the included articles will be tabulated in an Excel spreadsheet and a narrative synthesis of the data will be generated and presented according to its application in surgical and non-surgical orthodontics.
Conclusion
The search is expected to retrieve articles for all around the world. This project will be self-financed, and a protocol is registered at the PROSPERO site with registration number CRD42023463531.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 81 | PDF Downloads 17

References

1. Grischke, J., Johannsmeier, L., Eich, L., et al. Dentronics: Towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2020;36(6):765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.021.
2. Naniz, M.A., Askari, M., Zolfagharian, A., et al. 4D Printing: a cutting-edge platform for biomedical applications. Biomed Mater. 2022;17(6):062001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ac8e42.
3. Morag, E., Cornelis, F.H., Weisz, G., et al. Overcoming Barriers and Advancements in Endovascular Robotics: A Review of Systems and Developments. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023;26(3):100918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100918.
4. Alexander, S.A., Askari, M., Naniz, M.A., et al. Review on four-dimensional printed parts for dental applications. Mater Des. 2022;222:111056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111056.
5. Ahmad, P., Alam, M.K., Aldajani, A., et al. Dental Robotics: A Disruptive Technology. Sensors. 2021;21(10):3308. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103308.
6. Liu, C., Liu, Y., Xie, R., et al. The evolution of robotics: research and application progress of dental implant robotic systems. Int J Oral Sci. 2024;16(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-024-00296-x.
7. Qiu, Y., Ashok, A., Nguyen, C.C., et al. Integrated Sensors for Soft Medical Robotics. Small. 2024;20(22):e2308805. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202308805.
8. Sabbagh, H., Dotzer, B., Baumert, U., et al. Biomechanical simulation of segmented intrusion of a mandibular canine using Robot Orthodontic Measurement & Simulation System (ROSS). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;160:106720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106720.
9. Nassani, L.M., Javed, K., Amer, R.S., et al. Technology Readiness Level of Robotic Technology and Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review. Surgeries. 2024;5:273–287. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5020025.
10.Ahuja, D., Jose, N.P., Shetty, P. Role of Robotics in Transforming Orthodontic Practice—A Narrative Review. Int J Oral Health. 2024:16(4):283–289. https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_80_24.
11.Liu, H., Jiang, J.G., Li, Y.Z., et al. Structural design and simulation analysis of an orthodontic wire bending robot. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; IEEE; 2023; pp. 1419–1424. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA57826.2023.10215842.
12.Adkins, S.E., Vance, D.T., Dixon, K.S., et al. Making surgical education intuitive: A surgical robotics primer for preclinical medical students. Am J Surg. 2025;239:116057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116057.
13.Page, M., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
14.Frandsen, T.F., Bruun Nielsen, M.F., Lindhardt, C.L., et al. Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;127:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.005.
15.Cano-Verdugo, G., Flores-García, B.D., Núñez-Rocha, G.M., et al. Impact of urban farming on health: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf). 2024;46(3):e500–e509. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae056.
16.Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P.A., et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J. 2004;328(7454):1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
17.Schünemann, H.J., Cuello, C., Akl, E.A., et al. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012.
18.Rethlefsen, M.L. and Page, M.J. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022;110(2):253–257. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
19.Flores-García, B.D., Núñez-Rocha, G.M., Ávila-Ortíz, M.N., et al. Protocol for a systematic review of the health impact of urban farming interventions. Eco Cities. 2024;5(2):2786. https://doi.org/10.54517/ec2786.
20.Muhl, C., Wadge, S., Hussein, T. Social prescribing and students: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One. 202;18(8):e0289981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289981.
21.Bratti, V.F., Wilson, B.E., Fazelzad, R., et al. Scoping review protocol on the impact of antimicrobial resistance on cancer management and outcomes. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e068122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068122.