Application of statistical processes control for the performance improvement of a clinical engineering department
Main Article Content
Keywords
Control chart, Equipment maintenance, SPC
Abstract
This article addresses the fundamental role of Statistical as a quality tool in the field of clinical engineering, to improve and optimize internal processes. This study describes the methodology used to apply the SPC in a reference hospital's clinical engineering department. Data was collected over an extensive period, involving multiple medical equipment and verification procedures. These data were analyzed using various statistical tools, such as control charts, Pareto charts, and descriptive statistics.
The results showed stability in the department's processes, which made it possible to identify areas for potential improvement. Statistical analyses revealed behavior patterns and trends that were not previously apparent. Based on these conclusions, specific modifications were proposed in the department's processes to optimize efficiency, reduce costs, and improve service quality.
The implementation of these modifications based on evidence suggests that they would positively impact the general performance of the clinical engineering department if applied Key indicators could improve significantly, reflecting increased medical equipment reliability and availability, decreased unscheduled downtime, and increased satisfaction for department staff and equipment users.
In summary, this study highlights the importance of using SPC as a powerful improvement tool in clinical engineering. By adopting an approach based on data and scientific evidence, clinical engineering departments can achieve more efficient and effective management of their processes, contributing to higher-quality medical care and patient safety.
Downloads
References
2. Li J, Mao Y, Zhang J. Maintenance and Quality Control of Medical Equipment Based on Information Fusion Technology. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience [Internet]. 2022.
3. Sherwood MK. Quality Assurance in Biomedical or Clinical Engineering. Journal of Clinical Engineering [Internet]. 1991;16(6):479-83.
4. Ropella KM. Introduction to Statistics for Biomedical Engineers. Synthesis Lectures on Biomedical Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2007.
5. Benneyan JC. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care [Internet]. 2003; 12(6):458–64. Available from: https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/12/6/458
6. Bareño J. GUÍA PEDAGÓGICA CONTROL ESTADÍSTICO DE PROCESOS COMO GENERADOR DE UNA CULTURA DE LA MEDICIÓN EN LAS ORGANIZACIONES DE SALUD (IPS) [Internet]. 27-87
7. Govindarajan R, Llueguera E, Melero A, Molero J, Soler N, Rueda C, et al. El control estadístico de proceso puede ayudar a prevenir los errores de tratamiento sin aumentar los costes en radioterapia. Revista de Calidad Asistencial [Internet]. 2010; 25(5):281–90.
8. van de Glind EMM, Willems HC, Eslami S, Abu-Hanna A, Lems WF, Hooft L, et al. Estimating the Time to Benefit for Preventive Drugs with the Statistical Process Control Method: An Example with Alendronate. Drugs & Aging. 2016; 33(5):347–53.
9. Baker AW, Haridy S, Salem J, Ilieş I, Ergai AO, Samareh A, et al. Performance of statistical process control methods for regional surgical site infection surveillance: a 10-year multicentre pilot study. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2017; 27(8):600–10.
10. Ropella KM. Introduction to Statistics for Biomedical Engineers. Synthesis Lectures on Biomedical Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2007.
11. Cecchini A, Masselli GMP, Silvestri S. Evaluation and optimization of CES performances: application of Pareto principle to KPIs. Glob Clin Eng J [Internet]. 2021;4(1):14–21. Available en: http://dx.doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v4i1.87
12. Wang B. Evidence-Based Maintenance of Medical Equipment: An Outcomes-Based Method of Keeping Medical Equipment Safe and Reliable,1st edition. USA: Independently Published. 2019.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) must obtain all parties consent [co-author(s), others if applicable] and submit the acceptance of Copyright Agreement with their paper. Written permission must be obtained by the author for material that has been published in copyrighted material; this includes tables, figures, and quoted text that exceeds 150 words. A copy of all permissions must accompany the manuscript when published in copyrighted material. The author(s) hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. Author(s) must clearly indicate that approval for publication has been received in cases of institutional ownership.
In all submitted material authors retain all copyrights; however, the GlobalCE Journal reserve the right to reprint all or portions of the article and to post all or part of the article online. GlobalCE Journal reserves the right to edit manuscripts as required to publish in the journal. Authors are responsible for obtaining any and all clearances as appropriate. Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and original work (e.g. first published in the Global Clinical Engineering Journal) is properly cited with the original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on www.Globalce.org well as the copyright and license information must be included. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.